Poll Shows Worldwide Fear Over Climate Change

US and India Lag Behind Other Countries in Concern About Climate

2 Comments
Join the Conversation
Carbon Emissions and the Link to Climate Change - Kevin Dooley
Carbon Emissions and the Link to Climate Change - Kevin Dooley
A recent BBC/GlobeScan poll of 24,071 people in 23 countries shows that climate fears are on the rise - with 64% saying that climate change is a "very serious problem."

In 1998, the research firm GlobeScan began tracking international concern about changes in the climate. At the time, 44% of the respondents believed that climate change was a very serious concern. By 2009, that number increased to nearly two-thirds of those polled, indicating that worldwide fears about the environment are growing.

And the mounting evidence suggests these concerns are well justified: temperatures are rising, the world's ice is melting, human health is being threatened, and climate change could be irreversible for a thousand years. All good reasons for the growing anxiety about the environment.

The BBC World Service and GlobeScan, in an attempt to better understand the level of concern around the world, conducted a poll in 2009 and published their results in the report Climate Concerns Continue to Increase: Global Poll, released on December 7, 2009 (globescan.com) – on the eve of the UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen.

The BBC/GlobeScan poll asked respondents in different countries the same three questions:

  • How serious a problem do you consider climate change or global warming, due to the greenhouse effect?
  • Do you support or oppose the government making investments to address climate change even if this hurts the economy?
  • Which strategy should your country follow at the UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen?

GlobeScan conducted the poll between June 19 and October 13, 2009. The responses show overwhelming concern about the issue of climate change and support for some type of action.

How Serious a Problem Is Climate Change?

When poll respondents were questioned about the seriousness of climate change, they were asked to choose one of the following five options:

  • Very serious problem
  • Somewhat serious problem
  • Not very serious problem
  • Not a serious problem at all
  • Don't know/not applicable

Only 2% of the respondents do not consider climate change a serious problem at all, and 6% consider the climate problem not to be very serious. However, about 25% consider the problem somewhat serious, and a large majority – 64% – consider it very serious.

Chile and Brazil lead the pack of those that recognize the significance of climate change. In each of those countries, 86% of the respondents consider a changing climate to be a very serious issue. The US and India, on the other hand, fall at the opposite end of the spectrum, with only 45% of the respondents in each of those countries concerned enough about climate change to consider it a very serious problem – far below the 23-country average of 64%.

Should Government Invest in Climate Change Solutions?

The question about government investment in climate change solutions offered three choices from which to choose an answer:

  • Support
  • Oppose
  • Don't know/not applicable

The majority of the individuals polled – 61% – are in favor of their governments investing in solutions to climate change, even if it hurts the economy. China leads the way in support for government investment, with 89% of the respondents supporting the idea. Kenya comes in second, with 77% in favor, and France third, with 75%.

At the other end of the scale are the 29% who oppose government investment in climate change solutions. The Philippines leads the way in opposition, with 63% of the respondents opposed to government investment. Pakistan comes in second at a 58% opposition rate, and the US comes in third at 42%.

What Climate Change Strategy Should Be Followed?

When poll respondents were asked about the roles their countries should play at the UN Climate Change Summit, they were offered five options from which to choose:

  • Play a leadership role in setting ambitious targets to address climate change as quickly as possible.
  • Take a more moderate approach and support only gradual action to address climate change.
  • Do not agree to any international agreement that addresses climate change.
  • Don't know/not applicable

The majority of the respondents believe that their governments should take some type of action. Of those polled, 44% want their governments to take a leadership role, and 39% want them to take a moderate approach. The UK shows the greatest support for taking a leadership role, with 62% of the respondents in favor of this approach, followed closely by Kenya and Canada, each with a rate of 62%.

Spain, on the other hand, has the greatest support for a more moderate approach, with 61% of the respondents preferring a strategy whose actions are gradual. The Philippines follow Spain at a rate of 57% in favor of a moderate approach, and then Panama at 55%.

Only 6% of the respondents from the various countries are opposed to their governments going along with an international agreement. And the US once again leads the pack, with 14% of the respondents against any international agreement – over double the international average. Both Brazil and Pakistan follow close behind, with 12% in each of these countries opposed to any agreement.

Fears of Climate Change

Despite the lower levels of concern on the parts of the US and some other countries, the BBC/GlobeScan poll indicates that there's a growing worldwide consensus that climate change is a serious problem and governments should invest in strategies for dealing with this issue, even if it hurts the economy. In addition, most people want to see some sort of action, whether or not their countries take a leadership role. Public concern about climate change has reached its highest level since GlobeScan began polling, and now, more than ever, the public wants to see their governments get something done.

R. H. Sheldon, Adonis Photography

R.H. Sheldon - A number of years ago, long before I moved to the Northwest, I hitchhiked with a friend across Washington state to northern Idaho. We got ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 3+1?

Comments

Dec 14, 2009 12:50 PM
Guest :
The sky is falling, the sky is falling! Al Gore -- no Henny Penny. Al Gore = Henny Penny.

When “Earth Day” got started in the ‘70s it was all about “global cooling” from Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. Then it started to warm up, so it became “global warming” - from the same GHGs. Now it looks like we’re cooling again so now we call it “global climate change”. So, we’re covered for both directions now <g>.

During the Medieval Warming Period wine grapes were growing in southern England and the Vikings were farming in Greenland. We're not that warm yet as neither of those activities are taking place. Are we warming? Maybe, recent data shows a cooling trend and formerly rural areas that have been [sub]urbanized are getting warmer. Is it man caused? Again, the jury is out. CO2 comprises an incredibly small percentage (0.039%) 39/100th of a percent of our atmosphere. Mans activity accounts for about 6-8% of all CO2 emissions so, we *are* having an impact at the extreme margin. But let’s also be clear plants need CO2 to live just like we need oxygen to live. Is this significant enough to warrant all the drastic changes recommended? Viable routes exist to reduce CO2 and other GHG emissions (nuclear) that don't require draconian changes. However, nuclear power isn’t even being discussed (except for how it’s OK for Iran to have).

Personally, I'm a fan of the philosophy "take nothing but pictures and leave nothing but foot prints" but to hear many of the environmentalists – the biggest problem is man (exists). If they feel that strongly about it – don’t have kids so you don’t continue the problem, don’t live a modern life so you don’t contribute to the problem and don’t bug me because I think it’s a bunch of junk science.
Mar 29, 2010 2:34 PM
Guest :
People are scared because of the doomsday propoganda of the climate warming warriors.
Read "Rules of the Game " the liurgy of WWF,Greenpeace,DEFRA FUTERRA,etc.
Their tact is to put FEAR and DOUBT into people concerning climate warming,now change.
Their action is to SIZZLE the data,hot it up,"spice it" to get their propaganda across.
The science is flawed,massaged data ,made up situations like polar bears,melting glaciers.etc.all ot GREENWASH.
The marxist greens have infiltrated the whole of the UN,and our governments,including the EU and the USA.
Big business has made it their own with cap and trade[cap and tax to the people]
Prepare to live in a Marxist world of lowering wages,food and power. Communism is HERE
2 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement