Climate Change Irreversible for 1000 Years

Effects of Carbon Dioxide Felt Long After Emissions Stop

5 Comments
Join the Conversation
Climate Change from CO2 Felt for 1000 Years - Uwe Hermann
Climate Change from CO2 Felt for 1000 Years - Uwe Hermann
Human-induced climate change can lead to a millennium of higher atmospheric temperatures, lower dry-season rainfall, and increased land loss as oceans continue to rise.

Studies that examine the effects of atmospheric greenhouse gases often focus on the possible dangers of climate change in the 21st century. However, a new study published on February 10, 2009 by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates that climate change resulting from carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations is mostly irreversible for at least 1000 years after emissions stop.

The study - "Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions" - was conducted by Susan Solomon, Gian-Kaspar Plattner, Reto Knutti, and Pierre Friedling. They report that atmospheric temperature increases "are not expected to decrease significantly even if carbon dioxide emissions were to completely cease." They also report that many regions will experience irreversible dry-season rainfall reductions and that sea levels will continue to rise as a result of thermal expansion.

A Thousand Years of Hotter Temperatures

When atmospheric CO2 increases, so does the average global temperature. Even if human activity were to emit no additional CO2, the temperatures would remain relatively constant through the end of the millennium. This is because of the complex relationship between the atmosphere and the oceans. True, if CO2 emissions were to stop, atmospheric CO2 concentrations would begin to decay, and there would be a decrease of radiative forcing, which is a change in the difference between the incoming radiation energy and the outgoing radiation.

However, although radiative forcing decreases, the ocean's capacity for heat uptake also decreases. In fact, there is a "near balance between the long-term decrease of radiative forcing due to CO2 concentration decay and reduced cooling through heat loss to the ocean." As a result, atmospheric temperatures will not drop significantly for 1000 years after the CO2 emissions have stopped.

Below Average Dry-Season Rainfall for the Next Millennium

When the atmosphere warms, rainfall patterns begin to change, leading to adverse effects on the water supplies for humans, agriculture, and ecosystems worldwide. Indeed, decreases in rainfall have already been observed in large regions such as the Mediterranean, southern Africa, and southwestern North America.

According to the study's authors, "increased temperature causes increased water vapor concentrations, and changes in water vapor transport and the hydrologic cycle can hence be expected." What this means is that a drying pattern could be seen over much of the already-dry subtropics.

In northern Africa, southern Europe, and western Australia, dry-season rainfall could decrease by as much as 20% if the planet were to warm by 2 degrees Celsius. Under the same rise in temperatures, rain in eastern South America, southwestern North America, and southern Africa could drop about 10%, which is about the same amount of rainfall decrease as was seen during the Dust Bowl. And these drying patterns may be here for a thousand years.

Higher Sea Levels for 1000 Years

When the atmosphere grows warmer, the oceans grows warmer, and when the oceans grow warmer, they begin to expand, and when the oceans expand, sea levels rise. Add to this mix the loss of land ice and mountain glaciers, and there will undoubtedly be a significant impact on shorelines around the world.

Because higher atmospheric temperatures are likely to last through the end of the millennium, the ocean will continue to absorb heat and continue to expand for many years to come. "Sea level rise can be expected to affect many coastal regions," and that impact will last for at least a thousand years.

Reaching the Next Millennium

Even if CO2 emissions were to stop today, the impact of what has already been pumped into the atmosphere will be felt to the year 3000 and beyond. But CO2 emissions are not stopping. Indeed, they're projected to grow significantly over the next 20 years. How long, then, will it take to undo the additional damage that has yet to be done?

R. H. Sheldon, Adonis Photography

R.H. Sheldon - A number of years ago, long before I moved to the Northwest, I hitchhiked with a friend across Washington state to northern Idaho. We got ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 10+10?

Comments

Mar 26, 2009 2:48 PM
Guest :
Thanks, Bob. I heard about this recently, read your blog and watched Extreme Ice on PBS. This is really bad news and should be on everyone's mind. I suppose it will take more calamities and significant lost of costal land to get everyone's attention. The other issue with the melting glaciers and the Greenland ice shelf is that we rely on the fresh water provided by these massive freshwater stores for our survival.
Dec 25, 2009 6:07 PM
Guest :
The writer mentioned the dust bowl, formed in the 1930's when world temperatures were as high as they are today, and CO2 levels allegedly increasing.
How would the writer account for the fall in temperatures after the 30's untill the late 1960's, when the latest warming cycle began?
There have been fluctuations in world temperature since the dawn of time. There have not always been icecaps.The recent warming was no different from previous cycles.
The warmist brigade have taken the last 30 to 40 years out of context.
This is not the action of good scientists. The newspapers have misreported what many scientists have actually said.
The STERN Report was full of, "IF" , "POSSIBLY" , "MAYBE", and wil 'SHALL HAPPEN".
Projected computer models, based on speculation, are NOT FACT.
The story of the Emperor's New Clothes, springs to mind.
If ther=se scientist actually checked the data, thye would find that things do nit add up.
Why? Because the data have been distorted. If the warmists had a "GOOD SCIENTIFIC CASE", they would not have to misrepresent the data. The Hockey Stick graph scam, was the tip of the iceberg.
Why do they attempt to conceal the Medieval Warming, the Roman warming, the cooling in the 1940's and 1950's, and the Little Ice Age?
Such perversion of data is a crime against mankind.
There are many factors that affect world temperatures and Climate Change, blaming CO2 is narrow minded and not the work of a true, open minded scientific approach.
The AGW ideas do not stand up to Geological analysis, Historical analysis, or observation from current people's lifetimes. The great dust bowl, caused by weather, but exacerbated by bad husbandry.
Dec 25, 2009 6:14 PM
Guest :
A little reasearch will show that more of the world's glaciers are ADVANCING than RETREATING!
Only part of the Antarctic ice shelf is breaking up, while other poarts are geting colder.
People need to take a long term Geological view. Sea levels were not higher 1000 years ago, when the Vikings colonised Greenland. The English channel has not disapeared with the expansion of the Greenland ice sheet over the last 500 years. Have things changed so much over the last 500 years, that nature has adopted different rules?
The earth warms and then cools. Get used to it. The next cooling, like previous ones,could result in millions of deaths.
Dec 25, 2009 6:20 PM
Guest :
In the NATURAL periods of earth warming, the atmosphere is able to absorb more water as vapour. When these levels rise, clouds form, which act as an insulator, for a time. Temperatues rise. When there is a lot of cloud, it acts as a shield, which stops the sun warming the earth, and it cools down again. This is cyclical.
It is known to all scientists that water vapour is more significant as a greenhouse gas than CO2.
Dec 25, 2009 6:36 PM
Guest :
Higher world temperatures cause more evaporation and rain. The rain washes out the CO2. Problem solved.
5 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement